|
🇨🇳🇬🇧 This is a bilingual weekly newsletter. 👇 Scroll to bottom for ENGLISH VERSION 點擊閱讀網頁版 我們都看過這樣的場景:球隊不斷傳導,球在外圍流動,五次、六次、七次傳球。看起來節奏流暢、配合漂亮,但最終卻往往以一個倉促、受干擾的出手結束。 球是有在動,可防守卻始終沒被真正打開。那一回合看似團隊合作,實際上只是「動作多於意圖」的空轉。 許多教練在教進攻時,就像在跑一份清單:跑戰術、站好位置、等好機會。但他們常常忽略了現代籃球最關鍵的一個核心概念。 正如克利夫蘭騎士隊助理教練 Alex Sarama 所說,這個被忽略的概念,其實才是一切的關鍵:「大多數教練教進攻時,都像在跑清單:跑戰術、站定位、等好球出現。但他們錯過了一個重點,那不是一套戰術,也不是一個陣型,而是一個『優勢』。」 Sarama 所提出的「多米諾哲學」(Dominoes Philosophy)提供了一種全新的思維方式。重點不再是執行戰術模式,而是創造、辨識、並轉化「優勢」。 以下四個顛覆傳統的觀點,或許會徹底改變你對進攻的理解。 一、別再強迫傳球,學會尋找「第一個好球」最好的進攻,不一定是傳球最多的進攻。 第一個顛覆傳統的想法,是「傳越多不代表越好」。許多訓練要求球隊必須傳幾次球、或是讓每個人都碰到球才出手,Sarama 認為這樣的做法既不真實,也常常適得其反。 我們都記得聖安東尼奧馬刺的「The Beautiful Game」,那種美輪美奐的多次傳球進攻,但 Sarama 指出,這樣的傳導只有在防守成功恢復時才有必要。 真正的重點,是將第一次創造出的優勢轉化為「好球」,也就是上籃、灌籃或者Catch and shoot的三分球。如果這樣的機會在第一個「多米諾骨牌」倒下後就出現,就應該果斷出手。刻意增加傳球,只會讓防守重新站穩。 他坦言,自己以前也曾陷入這樣的誤區:「我以前也會這樣教,但後來我停止了。因為那不符合比賽的真實狀況。有時候最好的『多米諾』就是你接到球、突破、上籃得分。」 傳球應該要有目的性(也就是創造進攻優勢),而非為了傳而傳。每一次傳導,都應該讓優勢延續,而不是讓節奏重置。 二、學會「零秒決策」:快,才是關鍵要麼立刻行動,要麼失去優勢。 「多米諾哲學」的首要原則,就是所謂的「Zero-Second Decision(零秒決策)」。意思很簡單:當球員在擁有優勢的情況下接球時,必須立刻做出決定:投、傳或直接攻擊,沒有任何猶豫的空間。 這直接挑戰了傳統「三威脅姿勢」(Triple Threat)的概念:接球後停頓、觀察、假動作。 在 Sarama 的體系裡,那個被奉為基本功的姿勢,反而是扼殺優勢的元兇。因為當球員一接球就停下來觀察,哪怕只是一個假動作的時間,防守就能趁機回位,讓整個進攻的「骨牌效應」中斷。 籃球裡的優勢是轉瞬即逝的,一旦猶豫,就會失去。 關於「三威脅姿勢」是否已經過時的課題,我在幾年前曾經寫過,當時也是有一些教練嗤之以鼻。個人認為,「三威脅姿勢」有它存在的價值,但是在節奏越來越快的現代籃球,「零秒決策」確實很關鍵。 真正的快,不只是動作快,而是思維快:信任自己的判斷、信任隊友的反應、信任整個系統的流動。 三、把中距離當成「熔岩區」地板是熔岩(The Floor is Lava) 為了讓球員理解空間感,Sarama 用了一個生動的比喻:「地板是熔岩」。核心原則是「Stretch the Defense(拉開防守)」,我們永遠不希望一名防守者能同時守到兩個進攻者。 在這個比喻裡,「熔岩」指的就是中距離區域。當球員在一個「Dominoes」狀態(有優勢)下,如果突破後停在中距離等球,那就等於讓防守者可以同時顧兩個人。這時優勢就消失了。 正確的做法是「逃離熔岩」,也就是立刻往外線移動,重新拉開空間。對於內線球員而言,「dunker spot」(籃下兩側空間)則是安全區域,可以隨時準備接應上籃或補扣。這樣的移動保持了空間,也延長了防守者的補防距離。 唯一的例外是「動態切入」時可以短暫進入中距離完成進攻,但禁止「站」在那裡,因為那會讓整個節奏停滯。 四、教練的任務:設計環境,而非指揮球員設定限制,而非給出答案。 這是 Sarama 最具顛覆性的觀念之一:教練的角色,不是命令執行者,而是學習環境的設計者。 他主張,教練不再大聲喊出每一步該做什麼,而是透過「小場制遊戲」(Small-Sided Games, SSGs)加上不同的限制(constraints),讓球員在情境中自然養成正確的習慣。 幾個例子說明限制如何對應習慣的養成:
教練的工作,不是「告訴」答案,而是創造出能讓球員自己找出答案的環境。 「傳統方式是我們告訴球員該怎麼做;但在這種方式下,我們要做的,是創造並管理學習環境。」 結語:從「套路」走向「原則」Alex Sarama 的「多米諾哲學」從根本上改變了進攻觀。它讓球員不再只是「執行者」,而是能即時思考與決策的創造者。 從尋找第一個好球(觀念一),到零秒決策(觀念二),再到維持空間的熔岩法則(觀念三),最後是教練以環境塑造學習(觀念四),整個系統環環相扣,目標一致:讓「倒下的多米諾骨牌」永不停止。 最後留給每位教練一個問題:你是在教球員照著清單執行,還是在創造一個讓他們持續「推倒骨牌」的環境? 如果這篇文章有給你帶來啟發,歡迎轉發給正在尋找新訓練方向的教練或球員。我也會持續分享有關「Transforming Basketball」的一些新觀念。 — Jordan Rethinking Basketball Offense: 4 Ideas That Flip Traditional Coaching on Its HeadWe’ve all seen it: a basketball team that moves the ball beautifully around the perimeter, making five, six, seven passes. It looks like good offense, but it often ends with a contested, late-shot-clock jumper. The ball moves, but the defense never breaks down. The possession is a hollow victory of movement over meaning, where the defense is never truly forced into a compromising position. Many coaches teach offense like a checklist of plays to run, hoping a good shot will eventually materialize. But they often miss the single most crucial concept that underpins all effective modern offenses. As Alex Sarama, assistant coach of the Cleveland Cavaliers puts it, this missing piece is the key to everything: “Most coaches teach offense like a checklist run a play pitch your spots hope for a good shot but there’s one concept most coaches skip it’s not a set it’s not a formation it’s an advantage” Sarama’s philosophy of “Dominoes” provides a modern solution. It shifts the focus from running patterns to creating, recognizing, and converting advantages. Here are four counter-intuitive takeaways from his approach that can transform how you view offense. Takeaway 1: Stop Forcing Passes and Start Hunting for the First “Great Shot”The Best Offense Isn’t Always a Pass-Happy Offense The first idea that challenges conventional wisdom is that more passing isn’t always better. In direct contrast to traditional drills that mandate a specific number of passes or demand every player touches the ball, Sarama argues this approach is often unrealistic and counterproductive. While we all remember the beautiful, multi-pass sequences of teams like the San Antonio Spurs, Sarama clarifies that those long chains are only necessary if the defense successfully recovers. The primary goal is to convert the first advantage into a great shot—defined as a layup, a dunk, or a catch-and-shoot three. If that shot is available after the first “domino” falls, players should take it. Forcing extra passes when a great shot is already there only gives the defense time to reset. Sarama explains how his own thinking evolved, moving away from popular coaching constraints that don’t reflect in-game reality. “I used to do that too but then I stopped doing it the reason why is because it’s not realistic of the game… I also used to do things like every player must catch the ball on offense but it’s not representative of the game because maybe… the best dominoes could just be you catch the ball you drive and you score a layup” Takeaway 2: Master the “Zero-Second Decision”Act Instantly or Lose the Advantage The first and most critical habit in the Dominoes philosophy is the “zero-second decision.” This principle is simple but powerful: when a player catches the ball with an advantage, they must immediately shoot, pass, or drive. There is no time for hesitation. This directly contradicts the long-held coaching practice of catching the ball and settling into a “triple-threat stance” to read the floor. In Sarama’s system, the revered triple-threat stance becomes a potential advantage-killer. Holding the ball, even for a split second to jab-step or fake, is all the time a scrambling defense needs to recover, get back to a neutral position, and stop the “dominoes from falling.” An advantage in basketball is fleeting, and any delay in decision-making guarantees it will be lost. I wrote about whether the "three-threat stance" is obsolete a few years ago, and some coaches scoffed at it. Personally, I think that the "three-threat posture" has its value, but in modern basketball, which is getting faster and faster, "zero-second decision-making" is indeed crucial. Takeaway 3: Treat the Mid-Range Like LavaThe Floor is Lava To solve the critical problem of spacing, Sarama employs a powerful teaching heuristic: “The Floor is Lava.” This concept is built on a foundational principle he calls “Stretch the Defense,” which dictates that “we never want one defender to be able to guard two offense.” The “lava” analogy provides players with a simple, memorable rule to maintain that essential spacing. In this analogy, the “lava” is the mid-range area. When players are playing in a “dominoes” situation (with an advantage), they are forbidden from standing and waiting in the mid-range after an action like a drive-and-kick. As Sarama explains, “if I stay in there I’m losing the dominoes because one defender can guard two.” The correct action is to immediately “escape the lava” by relocating back outside the three-point line. For taller players, the dunker spot is also a safe zone, as it positions them for a high-value layup or dunk. This quick relocation maintains spacing, lengthens defensive closeouts, and makes the player available for the next action. There is, however, one critical exception: a player on a dynamic cut can catch the ball in the lava to finish a play. The rule is against standing there, which clogs the offense and allows the defense to recover. Takeaway 4: Coach the Environment, Not Just the PlayersOfficiate the Constraints, Don’t Dictate the Answers Perhaps the most significant philosophical shift Sarama proposes is in the role of the coach. Instead of adopting a traditional “command” style where the coach dictates every action, this approach requires the coach to become a designer who creates and manages the learning environment. This is done primarily through small-sided games (SSGs) with specific constraints that naturally shape player habits. The coach’s job is not to yell the answers, but to design a game that teaches the principles organically. The following examples show how constraints are directly linked to the desired habits:
In this system, the coach’s primary role is to “officiate the constraints” so that players learn the principles of play within the game itself. “…the traditional approach we see that we have to tell the players everything and they must do it instead with this approach we have to create and manage the environment” Conclusion: From Patterns to PrinciplesAlex Sarama’s “Dominoes” philosophy represents a fundamental shift from memorizing rigid patterns toward building a team of adaptable decision-makers. The entire system is interconnected: the goal is to take the first great shot (Takeaway 1), which requires players to make instantaneous decisions (Takeaway 2) and maintain perfect spacing (Takeaway 3). The coach’s role is not to shout these instructions but to build an environment where deliberate constraints (Takeaway 4) make these championship habits automatic. This approach leaves every coach with a critical question: Are you coaching your players to follow a checklist, or are you creating an environment where they learn to keep the dominoes falling? If this piece gave you new perspective, feel free to share it with a coach or player who’s exploring fresh ways to train. I’ll continue sharing new ideas inspired by Transforming Basketball in future editions. — Jordan |
Reveal the hidden layers of basketball through exclusive insights and stories (Without the clutter of generic news). Join 1000+ of readers and get the latest issue sent straight to your inbox.
🇨🇳🇬🇧 This is a bilingual weekly newsletter. 👇 Scroll to bottom for ENGLISH VERSION 點擊閱讀網頁版Read web version here 「這裡沒人把你當一回事。」 挑戰傳統,往往比提出新方法更難。 最近有位朋友向我推薦了一本書:Alex Sarama 所著的《Transforming Basketball: Changing How We Think About Basketball Performance》。去年7月,他受聘為 NBA 克利夫蘭騎士隊的球員發展總監,今年夏天正式升為球隊的助理教練。 我隨手翻開幾頁便被吸引住了。書中許多概念完全顛覆了我們長期以來在亞洲球館裡反覆操作的訓練方式。讀得越多,我就越覺得必須把這些想法分享給大家。 一個挑戰傳統的框架 Sarama 並不是全盤否定傳統。他承認老派教練與舊的方法在他們的那個年代具有劃時代的價值。但他同時也提出一個發人深省的觀點:在今日這個研究與方法論都在不斷精進的時代,墨守成規,本身就是一種風險。 這讓我想起林書豪的訓練師 Josh...
🇨🇳🇬🇧 This is a bilingual weekly newsletter. 👇 Scroll to bottom for ENGLISH VERSION 點擊閱讀網頁版Read web version here 為期兩天的 Bang Lee Skill Lab 精英籃球訓練營在上周末圓滿結束,在 Bang Lee 教練回國前,我和他做了一次簡單的訪問。他沒有再談技術細節或場上的高光時刻,而是留下了三個關鍵詞: 自信 聆聽 強度 他說,這是大馬年輕球員未來成長最需要補上的部分。天賦不是問題,「原材料」我們都有,而如何把潛力轉化為實力,正是我們面前最值得期待的方向。 除了 Bang Lee 的觀察,我自己也注意到另一個提升空間:核心力量、平衡與協調能力。這些基礎條件不像灌籃或快攻那樣直觀,但如果能補強它們,其他技術將更穩固。 一、自信 —— 成長的第一道門檻 Bang Lee 對我們球員的身體條件感到驚訝:身高、體格、速度,甚至可以灌籃,條件一應俱全。這代表我們已具備天賦,只差一步,就是建立真正的信念。...
🇨🇳🇬🇧 This is a bilingual weekly newsletter. 👇 Scroll to bottom for ENGLISH VERSION 點擊閱讀網頁版 Read Web Version Here 沒有人想以 33 比 62 落敗。 不是披上大馬戰袍的孩子,不是在場邊指揮的教練,也不是長途跋涉到場觀戰的父母。每一個踏上球場的人都帶著自豪、希望與犧牲。沒有人渴望帶著失敗走下場。 但當你看到 40 分鐘內出現 38 次失誤,幾乎每分鐘一次,你就會明白,問題早在開賽前就已經存在。差距並不在努力,而在於制度、結構與長期以來的選擇,早已決定了這些球員的處境。 在本週三(9月17日)的 FIBA U16 女籃亞洲杯乙組附加賽中,馬來西亞不敵伊朗,升上甲組的希望滅。幾週前,U16 男籃同樣以大比分慘負伊朗。兩場比賽,不同性別,相同結局。 更殘酷的真相是:這樣的故事已經重複了很多年。每一代球員都繼承了相同的不足。他們盡最大努力準備,卻始終要面對基礎更紮實、系統更完整的對手。 平等的投資...